target/xtensa: Use the pre-defined MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED macro
Instead of using the hardcoded (MemTxAttrs){0} for no memory attributes
let's use the already defined MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED macro instead.
This is technically a change of behaviour as MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED sets
the unspecified field to 1, but it doesn't look like anything is
checking this field.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
This commit is contained in:
parent
77fc026cdf
commit
2c5b1d2a47
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -1025,11 +1025,11 @@ void HELPER(ule_s)(CPUXtensaState *env, uint32_t br, float32 a, float32 b)
|
|||
uint32_t HELPER(rer)(CPUXtensaState *env, uint32_t addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return address_space_ldl(env->address_space_er, addr,
|
||||
(MemTxAttrs){0}, NULL);
|
||||
MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void HELPER(wer)(CPUXtensaState *env, uint32_t data, uint32_t addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
address_space_stl(env->address_space_er, addr, data,
|
||||
(MemTxAttrs){0}, NULL);
|
||||
MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue