Revert "i386/cpu: Warn about why CPUID_EXT_PDCM is not available"
This reverts commit 00268e0002.
(The only conflict is in the !is_tdx_vm() part of the condition,
which is safe to keep).
mark_unavailable_features() actively blocks usage of the feature,
so it is a functional change, not merely a emitting warning.
The commit was intended to merely warn if PDCM was enabled when
the performance counters are not, so revert it.
Reported-by: Christian A. Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Analyzed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Analyzed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20250819150235.785559-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5836af0783
commit
faaaf017d5
1 changed files with 0 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -8946,9 +8946,6 @@ void x86_cpu_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
|
|||
|
||||
/* PDCM is fixed1 bit for TDX */
|
||||
if (!cpu->enable_pmu && !is_tdx_vm()) {
|
||||
mark_unavailable_features(cpu, FEAT_1_ECX,
|
||||
env->user_features[FEAT_1_ECX] & CPUID_EXT_PDCM,
|
||||
"This feature is not available due to PMU being disabled");
|
||||
env->features[FEAT_1_ECX] &= ~CPUID_EXT_PDCM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue