- Improve the sifive_u DTB generation
- Add QSPI NOR flash to Microchip PFSoC
- Fix a bug in the Hypervisor HLVX/HLV/HSV instructions
- Fix some mstatus mask defines
- Ibex PLIC improvements
- OpenTitan memory layout update
- Initial steps towards support for 32-bit CPUs on 64-bit builds
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAABCAAdFiEE9sSsRtSTSGjTuM6PIeENKd+XcFQFAl/cRU4ACgkQIeENKd+X
cFTAPgf/dHOYiBeSZr0eg03LwpqiJ5ziVrvE9nvAjml8CsDvwlx6roEMT1Ynyquq
zs8sPb4a1Ro7rHBofHFqgHp8TO6wAiw2nDrT8YEt1iARO5Oh5IuHqs/wi8SNB2QF
d1Dv8/zIBOkK5+Fg/DQHTrPgq4fJZwY2jnVZAyUBuMW5UkvCVlJI4zGPwYyh+4ZS
xTWogMzSbyer3evfTg8f8AhvCGQMITwLo6Nxc4wj3bf1ZE8Br9UxorqPme4UwJ+r
Ip9/jXDlKI9BeE85XoOrQJNLR7OzLgdQ1S/LjeBYLQmsltOD49YcH6a6AX3YjDwW
Jj6GgXBTFGIUXbxc3ADpoMJQp+xDSA==
=Vj2m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/alistair/tags/pull-riscv-to-apply-20201217-1' into staging
A collection of RISC-V improvements:
- Improve the sifive_u DTB generation
- Add QSPI NOR flash to Microchip PFSoC
- Fix a bug in the Hypervisor HLVX/HLV/HSV instructions
- Fix some mstatus mask defines
- Ibex PLIC improvements
- OpenTitan memory layout update
- Initial steps towards support for 32-bit CPUs on 64-bit builds
# gpg: Signature made Fri 18 Dec 2020 05:59:42 GMT
# gpg: using RSA key F6C4AC46D4934868D3B8CE8F21E10D29DF977054
# gpg: Good signature from "Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>" [full]
# Primary key fingerprint: F6C4 AC46 D493 4868 D3B8 CE8F 21E1 0D29 DF97 7054
* remotes/alistair/tags/pull-riscv-to-apply-20201217-1: (23 commits)
riscv/opentitan: Update the OpenTitan memory layout
hw/riscv: Use the CPU to determine if 32-bit
target/riscv: cpu: Set XLEN independently from target
target/riscv: csr: Remove compile time XLEN checks
target/riscv: cpu_helper: Remove compile time XLEN checks
target/riscv: cpu: Remove compile time XLEN checks
target/riscv: Specify the XLEN for CPUs
target/riscv: Add a riscv_cpu_is_32bit() helper function
target/riscv: fpu_helper: Match function defs in HELPER macros
hw/riscv: sifive_u: Remove compile time XLEN checks
hw/riscv: spike: Remove compile time XLEN checks
hw/riscv: virt: Remove compile time XLEN checks
hw/riscv: boot: Remove compile time XLEN checks
riscv: virt: Remove target macro conditionals
riscv: spike: Remove target macro conditionals
target/riscv: Add a TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE CPU
hw/riscv: Expand the is 32-bit check to support more CPUs
intc/ibex_plic: Clear interrupts that occur during claim process
target/riscv: Fix definition of MSTATUS_TW and MSTATUS_TSR
target/riscv: Fix the bug of HLVX/HLV/HSV
...
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Correctly implement save/restore of the tstate field in
sparc64_get_context() and sparc64_set_context():
* Don't use the CWP value from the guest in set_context
* Construct and save a tstate value rather than leaving
it as zero in get_context
To do this we factor out the "calculate TSTATE value from CPU state"
code from sparc_cpu_do_interrupt() into its own sparc64_tstate()
function; that in turn requires us to move some of the function
prototypes out from inside a CPU_NO_IO_DEFS ifdef guard.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201106152738.26026-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
The kernel does not restore the g7 register in sparc64_set_context();
neither should we. (We still save it in sparc64_get_context().)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201106152738.26026-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Unlike the kernel macros, our __get_user() and __put_user() do not
return a failure code. Kernel code typically has a style of
err |= __get_user(...); err |= __get_user(...);
and then checking err at the end. In sparc64_get_context() our
version of the code dropped the accumulating into err but left the
"if (err) goto do_sigsegv" checks, which will never be taken. Delete
unnecessary if()s.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201106152738.26026-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
The handling of the FPU state in sparc64_get_context() and
sparc64_set_context() is not the same as what the kernel actually
does: we unconditionally read and write the FP registers and the
FSR, GSR and FPRS, but the kernel logic is more complicated:
* in get_context the kernel has code for saving FPU registers,
but it is hidden inside an "if (fenab) condition and the
fenab flag is always set to 0 (inside an "#if 1" which has
been in the kernel for over 15 years). So the effect is that
the FPU state part is always written as zeroes.
* in set_context the kernel looks at the fenab field in the
structure from the guest, and only restores the state if
it is set; it also looks at the structure's FPRS to see
whether either the upper or lower or both halves of the
register file have valid data.
Bring our implementations into line with the kernel:
* in get_context:
- clear the entire target_ucontext at the top of the
function (as the kernel does)
- then don't write the FPU state, so those fields remain zero
- this fixes Coverity issue CID 1432305 by deleting the code
it was complaining about
* in set_context:
- check the fenab and the fpsr to decide which parts of
the FPU data to restore, if any
- instead of setting the FPU registers by doing two
32-bit loads and filling in the .upper and .lower parts
of the CPU_Double union separately, just do a 64-bit
load of the whole register at once. This fixes Coverity
issue CID 1432303 because we now access the dregs[] part
of the mcfpu_fregs union rather than the sregs[] part
(which is not large enough to actually cover the whole of
the data, so we were accessing off the end of sregs[])
We change both functions in a single commit to avoid potentially
breaking bisection.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201106152738.26026-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[lv: fix FPRS_DU loop s/31/32/]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
The three options handling `struct sock_fprog` (TUNATTACHFILTER,
TUNDETACHFILTER, and TUNGETFILTER) are not implemented. Linux kernel
keeps a user space pointer in them which we cannot correctly handle.
Signed-off-by: Josh Kunz <jkz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shu-Chun Weng <scw@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Message-Id: <20200929014801.655524-1-scw@google.com>
[lv: use 0 size in unlock_user()]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Message-Id: <mvm361eer3n.fsf@suse.de>
[lv: copy back offset only if there is no error]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Coverity always complains about switch-case statements that fall through
the next one when there is no comment in between - which could indicate
a forgotten "break" statement. Instead of handling these issues after
they have been committed, it would be better to avoid them in the build
process already. Thus let's enable the -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning now.
The "=2" level seems to be a good compromise between being too strict and
too generic about the possible comments, so we'll start with "=2" for now.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-13-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Add missing 'break' to fix:
hw/rtc/twl92230.c: In function ‘menelaus_write’:
hw/rtc/twl92230.c:713:5: error: label at end of compound statement
713 | default:
| ^~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211154605.511714-1-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When compiling with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough, the compiler complains
about a missing fallthrough annotation in this file. Looking at the code,
the fallthrough is indeed wanted here, so let's add a proper comment.
Message-Id: <20201217154138.1547274-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
The softfloat tests are external repositories, so we do not care
about implicit fallthrough warnings in this code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-12-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To be able to compile this file with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough,
we need to add some fallthrough annotations to the case statements
that might fall through. Unfortunately, the typical "/* fallthrough */"
comments do not work here as expected since some case labels are
wrapped in macros and the compiler fails to match the comments in
this case. But using __attribute__((fallthrough)) seems to work fine,
so let's use that instead (by introducing a new QEMU_FALLTHROUGH
macro in our compiler.h header file).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-11-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
target/sparc/win_helper.c: In function ‘get_gregset’:
target/sparc/win_helper.c:304:9: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
304 | trace_win_helper_gregset_error(pstate);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
target/sparc/win_helper.c:306:5: note: here
306 | case 0:
| ^~~~
Add the corresponding "fall through" comment to fix it.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-10-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
target/sparc/translate.c: In function ‘gen_st_asi’:
target/sparc/translate.c:2320:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
2320 | if (!(dc->def->features & CPU_FEATURE_HYPV)) {
| ^
target/sparc/translate.c:2329:5: note: here
2329 | case GET_ASI_DIRECT:
| ^~~~
The "fall through" statement place is not correctly identified by the compiler.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-9-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
../accel/tcg/user-exec.c: In function ‘handle_cpu_signal’:
../accel/tcg/user-exec.c:169:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
169 | cpu_exit_tb_from_sighandler(cpu, old_set);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../accel/tcg/user-exec.c:172:9: note: here
172 | default:
Mark the cpu_exit_tb_from_sighandler() function with QEMU_NORETURN to fix it.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-8-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c: In function ‘kvm_arm_gicv3_put’:
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:484:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
kvm_gicc_access(s, ICC_AP0R_EL1(1), ncpu, ®64, true);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:485:9: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:495:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
kvm_gicc_access(s, ICC_AP1R_EL1(2), ncpu, ®64, true);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:496:9: note: here
case 6:
^~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:498:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
kvm_gicc_access(s, ICC_AP1R_EL1(1), ncpu, ®64, true);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:499:9: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c: In function ‘kvm_arm_gicv3_get’:
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:634:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
c->icc_apr[GICV3_G0][2] = reg64;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:635:9: note: here
case 6:
^~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:637:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
c->icc_apr[GICV3_G0][1] = reg64;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:638:9: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:648:39: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
c->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][2] = reg64;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:649:9: note: here
case 6:
^~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:651:39: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
c->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][1] = reg64;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:652:9: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-7-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
The current "#ifdef TARGET_X86_64" statement affects
the compiler's determination of fall through.
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
target/i386/translate.c: In function ‘gen_shiftd_rm_T1’:
target/i386/translate.c:1773:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (is_right) {
^
target/i386/translate.c:1782:5: note: here
case MO_32:
^~~~
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-6-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
../hw/timer/renesas_tmr.c: In function ‘tmr_read’:
../hw/timer/renesas_tmr.c:221:19: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
221 | } else if (ch == 0) {i
| ^
../hw/timer/renesas_tmr.c:224:5: note: here
224 | case A_TCORB:
| ^~~~
Add the corresponding "fall through" comment to fix it.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-5-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When compiling with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough, gcc complains about
missing fallthrough annotations in this file. Looking at the code,
the fallthrough is indeed wanted here, but instead of adding the
annotations, it can be done more efficiently by simply calculating
the offset with a subtraction instead of increasing a local variable
one by one.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-4-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Looking at the way the code is formatted here (there is an empty line
after break statements, but none where the break is missing), and the
instruction set overview at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicore the
fallthrough is very likely intended here. So add a fallthrough comment
to make the it compilable with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-3-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
For compiling with -Wimplicit-fallthrough we need to fix the
fallthrough annotations in the libvixl code. This is based on
the following upstream vixl commit by Martyn Capewell:
https://git.linaro.org/arm/vixl.git/commit/?id=de326f850f736c3a337
"GCC 7 enables switch/case fallthrough checking, but this fails in
VIXL, because the annotation we use is Clang specific.
Also, fix a missing annotation in the disassembler."
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-2-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Instead of using string compares to determine if a RISC-V machine is
using 32-bit or 64-bit CPUs we can use the initalised CPUs. This avoids
us having to maintain a list of CPU names to compare against.
This commit also fixes the name of the function to match the
riscv_cpu_is_32bit() function.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 8ab7614e5df93ab5267788b73dcd75f9f5615e82.1608142916.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com
Currently the riscv_is_32_bit() function only supports the generic rv32
CPUs. Extend the function to support the SiFive and LowRISC CPUs as
well.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Message-id: 9a13764115ba78688ba61b56526c6de65fc3ef42.1608142916.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com
Previously if an interrupt occured during the claim process (after the
interrupt is claimed but before it's completed) it would never be
cleared.
This patch ensures that we also clear the hidden_pending bits as well.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Jackie Ke <jackieke724@hotmail.com>
Message-id: 4e9786084a86f220689123cc8a7837af8fa071cf.1607100423.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com
The TW and TSR fields should be bits 21 and 22 and not 30/29.
This was found while comparing QEMU behaviour against the sail formal
model (https://github.com/rems-project/sail-riscv/).
Signed-off-by: Alex Richardson <Alexander.Richardson@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20201130170117.71281-1-Alexander.Richardson@cl.cam.ac.uk
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We found that the hypervisor virtual-machine load and store instructions,
included HLVX/HLV/HSV, couldn't access guest userspace memory.
In the riscv-privileged spec, HLVX/HLV/HSV is defined as follow:
"As usual when V=1, two-stage address translation is applied, and
the HS-level sstatus.SUM is ignored."
But get_physical_address() doesn't ignore sstatus.SUM, when HLVX/HLV/HSV
accesses guest userspace memory. So this patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Yifei Jiang <jiangyifei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yipeng Yin <yinyipeng1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20201130012810.899-1-jiangyifei@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Fix code style. Don't use '#' flag of printf format ('%#') in
format strings, use '0x' prefix instead
Signed-off-by: Xinhao Zhang <zhangxinhao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai Deng <dengkai1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20201116140148.2850128-1-zhangxinhao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The sifive_u machine emulates two UARTs but we have only UART0 DT
node in the generated DTB so this patch adds UART1 DT node in the
generated DTB.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20201111094725.3768755-1-anup.patel@wdc.com
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
linux-user binaries are displayed altogether. Use the '*'
character to force displaying them as bullet list (one list
per architecture).
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Message-Id: <20201119160838.1981709-1-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Userland ELF binaries using Loongson SIMD instructions have the
HWCAP_LOONGSON_MMI bit set [1].
Binaries compiled for Loongson 3A [2] have the HWCAP_LOONGSON_EXT
bit set for the LQ / SQ instructions.
[1] commit 8e2d5831e4 ("target/mips: Legalize Loongson insn flags")
[2] commit af868995e1 ("target/mips: Add Loongson-3 CPU definition")
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20201214003215.344522-7-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
