Currently, the postcopy blocktime feature maintains vCPU fault information
using an array (vcpu_addr[]). It has two issues.
Issue 1: Performance Concern
============================
The old algorithm was almost OK and fast on inserts, except that the lookup
is slow and won't scale if there are a lot of vCPUs: when a page is copied
during postcopy, mark_postcopy_blocktime_end() will walk the whole array
trying to find which vCPUs are blocked by the address. So it needs
constant O(N) walk for each page resolution.
Alexey (the author of postcopy blocktime) mentioned the perf issue and how
to optimize it in a piece of comment in the page resolution path. The
comment was (interestingly..) not complete, but it's relatively clear what
he wanted to say about this perf issue.
Issue 2: Wrong Accounting on re-entrancies
==========================================
People might think that each vCPU should only and always get one fault at a
time, so that when the blocktime layer captured one fault on one vCPU, we
should never see another fault message on this vCPU.
It's almost correct, except in some extreme rare cases.
Case 1: it's possible the fault thread processes the userfaultfd messages
too fast so it can see >1 messages on one vCPU before the previous one was
resolved.
Case 2: it's theoretically also possible one vCPU can get even more than
one message on the same fault address if a fault is retried by the
kernel (e.g., handle_userfault() got interrupted before page resolution).
As this info might be important, instead of using commit message, I put
more details into the code as comment, when introducing an array
maintaining concurrent faults on one vCPU. Please refer to the comments
for details on both cases, especially case 1 which can be tricky.
Case 1 sounds rare, but it can be easily reproduced locally for me when we
run blocktime together with the migration-test on the vanilla postcopy.
New Design
==========
This patch should do almost what Alexey mentioned, but slightly
differently: instead of having an array to maintain vCPU fault addresses,
for each of the fault message we push a message into a hash, indexed by the
fault address.
With the hash, it can replace the old two structs: both the vcpu_addr[]
array, and also the array to store the start time of the fault. However
due to above we need one more counter array to account concurrent faults on
the same vCPU - that should even be needed in the old code, it's just that
the old code was buggy and it will blindly overwrite an existing
entry.. now we'll start to really track everything.
The hash structure might be more efficient than tree to maintain such
addr->(cpu, fault_time) information, so that the insert() and lookup()
paths should ideally both be ~O(1). After all, we do not need to sort.
Here we need to do one remove() though after the lookup(). It could be
slow but only if many vCPUs faulted exactly on the same address (so when
the list of cpu entries is long), which should be unlikely. Even with that,
it's still a worst case O(N) (consider 400 vCPUs faulted on the same
address and how likely is it..) rather than a constant O(N) complexity.
When at it, touch up the tracepoints to make them slightly more useful.
One tracepoint is added when walking all the fault entries.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613141217.474825-13-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
The variable vcpu_total_blocktime isn't easy to follow. In reality, it
wants to capture the case where all vCPUs are stopped, and now there will
be some vCPUs starts running.
The name now starts to conflict with vcpu_blocktime_total[], meanwhile it's
actually not necessary to have the variable at all: since nobody is
touching smp_cpus_down except ourselves, we can safely do the calculation
at the end before decrementing smp_cpus_down.
Hopefully this makes the logic easier to read, side benefit is we drop one
temp var.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613141217.474825-12-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Looking up the vCPU index for each fault can be expensive when there're
hundreds of vCPUs. Provide a cache for tid->vcpu instead with a hash
table, then lookup from there.
When at it, add another counter to record how many non-vCPU faults it gets.
For example, the main thread can also access a guest page that was missing.
These kind of faults are not accounted by blocktime so far.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613141217.474825-11-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Before this patch, the blocktime context can be created very early, because
postcopy_ram_supported_by_host() <- migrate_caps_check() can happen during
migration object init.
The trick here is the blocktime context needs system vCPU information,
which seems to be possible to change after that point. I didn't verify it,
but it doesn't sound right.
Now move it out and initialize the context only when postcopy listen
starts. That is already during a migration so it should be guaranteed the
vCPU topology can never change on both sides.
While at it, assert that the ctx isn't created instead this time; the old
"if" trick isn't needed when we're sure it will only happen once now.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613141217.474825-10-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Blocktime so far only cares about the time one vcpu (or the whole system)
got blocked. It would be also be helpful if it can also report the latency
of page requests, which could be very sensitive during postcopy.
Blocktime itself is sometimes not very important, especially when one
thinks about KVM async PF support, which means vCPUs are literally almost
not blocked at all because the guest OS is smart enough to switch to
another task when a remote fault is needed.
However, latency is still sensitive and important because even if the guest
vCPU is running on threads that do not need a remote fault, the workload
that accesses some missing page is still affected.
Add two entries to the report, showing how long it takes to resolve a
remote fault. Mention in the QAPI doc that this is not the real average
fault latency, but only the ones that was requested for a remote fault.
Unwrap get_vcpu_blocktime_list() so we don't need to walk the list twice,
meanwhile add the entry checks in qtests for all postcopy tests.
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dave@treblig.org>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613141217.474825-9-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Add a field to count how many remote faults one vCPU has taken. So far
it's still not used, but will be soon.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613141217.474825-8-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
With 64-bit fields, it is trivial. The caution is when exposing any values
in QMP, it was still declared with milliseconds (ms). Hence it's needed to
do the convertion when exporting the values to existing QMP queries.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613141217.474825-7-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Now with 64bits, the offseting using start_time is not needed anymore,
because the array can always remember the whole timestamp.
Then drop the unused parameter in get_low_time_offset() altogether.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613141217.474825-6-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
I am guessing it was used to be 32bits because of the atomic ops. Now all
the atomic ops are gone and we're protected by a mutex instead, it's ok we
can switch to 64 bits.
Reasons to move over:
- Allow further patches to change the unit from ms to us: with postcopy
preempt mode, we're really into hundreds of microseconds level on
blocktime. We'd better be able to trap those.
- This also paves way for some other tricks that the original version
used to avoid overflows, e.g., start_time was almost only useful before
to make sure the sampled timestamp won't overflow a 32-bit field.
- This prepares further reports on top of existing data collected,
e.g. average page fault latencies. When average operation is taken into
account, milliseconds are simply too coarse grained.
When at it:
- Rename page_fault_vcpu_time to vcpu_blocktime_start.
- Rename vcpu_blocktime to vcpu_blocktime_total.
- Touch up the trace-events to not dump blocktime ctx pointer
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613141217.474825-5-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
The postcopy blocktime feature was tricky that it used quite some atomic
operations over quite a few arrays and vars, without explaining how that
would be thread safe. The thread safety here is about concurrency between
the fault thread and the fault resolution threads, possible to access the
same chunk of data. All these atomic ops can be expensive too before
knowing clearly how it works.
OTOH, postcopy has one page_request_mutex used to serialize the received
bitmap updates. So far it's ok - we don't yet have a lot of threads
contending the lock. It might change after multifd will be supported, but
that's a separate story. What is important is, with that mutex, it's
pretty lightweight to move all the blocktime maintenance into the mutex
critical section. It's because the blocktime layer is lightweighted:
almost "remember which vcpu faulted on which address", and "ok we get some
fault resolved, calculate how long it takes". It's also an optional
feature for now (but I have thought of changing that, maybe in the future).
Let's push the blocktime layer into the mutex, so that it's always
thread-safe even without any atomic ops.
To achieve that, I'll need to add a tid parameter on fault path so that
it'll start to pass the faulted thread ID into deeper the stack, but not
too deep. When at it, add a comment for the shared fault handler (for
example, vhost-user devices running with postcopy), to mention a TODO. One
reason it might not be trivial is that vhost-user's userfaultfds should be
opened by vhost-user process, so it's pretty hard to control making sure
the TID feature will be around. It wasn't supported before, so keep it
like that for now.
Now we should be as ease when everything is protected by a mutex that we
always take anyway.
One side effect: we can finally remove one ramblock_recv_bitmap_test() in
mark_postcopy_blocktime_begin(), which was pretty weird and which also
includes a weird (but maybe necessary.. but maybe not?) operation to inject
a blocktime entry then quickly erase it.. When we're with the mutex, and
when we make sure it's invoked after checking the receive bitmap, it's not
needed anymore. Instead, we assert.
As another side effect, this paves way for removing all atomic ops in all
the mem accesses in blocktime layer.
Note that we need a stub for mark_postcopy_blocktime_begin() for Windows
builds.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613141217.474825-3-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
This is a follow up on the other commit "migration/ram: avoid to do log
clear in the last round" but for postcopy.
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250514115827.3216082-1-yanfei.xu@bytedance.com
I can observe more than 10% reduction of average page fault latency during
postcopy phase with this optimization:
Before: 268.00us (+-1.87%)
After: 232.67us (+-2.01%)
The test was done with a 16GB VM with 80 vCPUs, running a workload that
busy random writes to 13GB memory.
Cc: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613140801.474264-12-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
There're a few things off here in that logic, rewrite it. When at it, add
rich comment to explain each of the decisions.
Since this is very sensitive path for migration, below are the list of
things changed with their reasonings.
(1) Exact pending size is only needed for precopy not postcopy
Fundamentally it's because "exact" version only does one more deep
sync to fetch the pending results, while in postcopy's case it's
never going to sync anything more than estimate as the VM on source
is stopped.
(2) Do _not_ rely on threshold_size anymore to decide whether postcopy
should complete
threshold_size was calculated from the expected downtime and
bandwidth only during precopy as an efficient way to decide when to
switchover. It's not sensible to rely on threshold_size in postcopy.
For precopy, if switchover is decided, the migration will complete
soon. It's not true for postcopy. Logically speaking, postcopy
should only complete the migration if all pending data is flushed.
Here it used to work because save_complete() used to implicitly
contain save_live_iterate() when there's pending size.
Even if that looks benign, having RAMs to be migrated in postcopy's
save_complete() has other bad side effects:
(a) Since save_complete() needs to be run once at a time, it means
when moving RAM there's no way moving other things (rather than
round-robin iterating the vmstate handlers like what we do with
ITERABLE phase). Not an immediate concern, but it may stop working
in the future when there're more than one iterables (e.g. vfio
postcopy).
(b) postcopy recovery, unfortunately, only works during ITERABLE
phase. IOW, if src QEMU moves RAM during postcopy's save_complete()
and network failed, then it'll crash both QEMUs... OTOH if it failed
during iteration it'll still be recoverable. IOW, this change should
further reduce the window QEMU split brain and crash in extreme cases.
If we enable the ram_save_complete() tracepoints, we'll see this
before this patch:
1267959@1748381938.294066:ram_save_complete dirty=9627, done=0
1267959@1748381938.308884:ram_save_complete dirty=0, done=1
It means in this migration there're 9627 pages migrated at complete()
of postcopy phase.
After this change, all the postcopy RAM should be migrated in iterable
phase, rather than save_complete():
1267959@1748381938.294066:ram_save_complete dirty=0, done=0
1267959@1748381938.308884:ram_save_complete dirty=0, done=1
(3) Adjust when to decide to switch to postcopy
This shouldn't be super important, the movement makes sure there's
only one in_postcopy check, then we are clear on what we do with the
two completely differnt use cases (precopy v.s. postcopy).
(4) Trivial touch up on threshold_size comparision
Which changes:
"(!pending_size || pending_size < s->threshold_size)"
into:
"(pending_size <= s->threshold_size)"
Reviewed-by: Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613140801.474264-11-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Take notes on start/end state of dirty pages for the whole system.
Reviewed-by: Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613140801.474264-10-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
The check over PAGE_DIRTY_FOUND isn't necessary. We could indent one less
and assert that instead.
Reviewed-by: Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613140801.474264-9-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Since we use the same save_complete() hook for both precopy and postcopy,
add a set of helpers to invoke the hook() to dedup the code.
Reviewed-by: Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613140801.474264-8-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Now after merging the precopy and postcopy version of complete() hook,
rename the precopy version from save_live_complete_precopy() to
save_complete().
Dropping the "live" when at it, because it's in most cases not live when
happening (in precopy).
No functional change intended.
Reviewed-by: Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613140801.474264-7-peterx@redhat.com
[peterx: squash the fixup that covers a few more doc spots, per Juraj]
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
The hook is only defined in two vmstate users ("ram" and "block dirty
bitmap"), meanwhile both of them define the hook exactly the same as the
precopy version. Hence, this postcopy version isn't needed.
No functional change intended.
Reviewed-by: Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613140801.474264-6-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Move it out of vanilla postcopy session, but instead a standalone feature.
When at it, removing the NOTE because it's incorrect now after introduction
of max-postcopy-bandwidth, which can control the throughput even for
postcopy phase.
Reviewed-by: Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613140801.474264-4-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Unfortunately, it was never correctly shown..
This is only found when I started to look into making the blocktime feature
more useful (so as to avoid using bpftrace, even though I'm not sure which
one will be harder to use..).
So the old dump would look like this:
Postcopy vCPU Blocktime: 0-1,4,10,21,33,46,48,59
Even though there're actually 40 vcpus, and the string will merge same
elements and also sort them.
To fix it, simply loop over the uint32List manually. Now it looks like:
Postcopy vCPU Blocktime (ms):
[15, 0, 0, 43, 29, 34, 36, 29, 37, 41,
33, 37, 45, 52, 50, 38, 40, 37, 40, 49,
40, 35, 35, 35, 81, 19, 18, 19, 18, 30,
22, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dave@treblig.org>
Cc: Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@samsung.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613140801.474264-3-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Dave suggested the HMP output for "info migrate" can not only leverage the
lines but also better grouping:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/aC4_-nMc7FwsMf9p@gallifrey
I followed Dave's suggestion, and some more modifications on top:
- Added all elements into the picture
- Use size_to_str() and drop most of the units: benefit is more friendly
to most human eyes, bad side effect is lose of details, but that should
be corner case per my uses, and one can still leverage the QMP interface
when necessary.
- Sub-grouping for "Transfers" ("Channels" and "Page Types").
- Better indentations
Sample output:
(qemu) info migrate
Status: postcopy-active
Time (ms): total=47317, setup=5, down=8
RAM info:
Throughput (Mbps): 1342.83
Sizes: pagesize=4 KiB, total=4.02 GiB
Transfers: transferred=1.41 GiB, remain=2.46 GiB
Channels: precopy=15.2 MiB, multifd=0 B, postcopy=1.39 GiB
Page Types: normal=367713, zero=41195
Page Rates (pps): transfer=40900, dirty=4
Others: dirty_syncs=2, postcopy_req=57503
Suggested-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dave@treblig.org>
Tested-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dave@treblig.org>
Reviewed-by: Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613140801.474264-2-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-108-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-107-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-106-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-105-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
For non-widening, we can use float_muladd_negate_product,
For widening, which uses dot-product, we need to handle
the negation explicitly.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-104-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Our current BFMOPA opcode pattern is the widening version
of the insn. Rename it to BFMOPA_w, to make way for
the non-widening version added in SME2.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-103-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The pattern we currently have as FMOPA_h is the "widening" insn
that takes fp16 inputs and produces single-precision outputs.
This is unlike FMOPA_s and FMOPA_d, which are non-widening
produce outputs the same size as their inputs.
SME2 introduces a non-widening fp16 FMOPA operation; rename
FMOPA_h to FMOPA_w_h (for 'widening'), so we can use FMOPA_h
for the non-widening version, giving it a name in line with
the other non-widening ops FMOPA_s and FMOPA_d.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-102-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-101-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-100-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-99-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-98-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Move from sme_helper.c to the shared header.
Add a comment noting the lack of atomicity.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-97-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-96-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The msz > esz encodings are reserved, and some of
them are about to be reused. Split these patterns
so that the new insns do not overlap.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-95-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Implement the SVE2p1 consecutive register LD1/ST1,
and the SME2 strided register LD1/ST1.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-94-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-93-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-92-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-91-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-90-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-89-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-88-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-87-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-86-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-85-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250704142112.1018902-84-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
